EXPLAIN THE DIFFERENT MOTIVATIONAL THEORIES AND THE
APPLICATIONS WITHIN AN ORGANIZATIONS (3B)
There are
three major motivational theories which are
·
The
theory of Maslow hierarchy of needs
·
The
Herzberg motivation-hygiene theory
·
The
expectant theory.
·
Maslow
hierarchy of needs- This is the type of motivational theory which believes that
employee are motivated by way of meeting their needs so also Maslow believes
that the needs of the people are arranged in order of importance. The first
level of the pyramid deals with the physiological needs and if all this needs
are not met Maslow believes that the next level of the pyramid will not be
thought about but once it is met the top level of the pyramid that is
associated with the psychological needs will be make a priority. Maslow also
let us believes that if the physiological, safety, and esteem are not met the
physical indication might not show on the body but the individual will be
feeling tense and anxious, Maslow also made us believes that the only real
motive all other motives being its various form is to realized ones maximum
possibilities and potentials and this self-actualization and this can be
possible after the lower level needs have been met.
There are a lot
of criticism for Maslow theories, they believe that since every individual have
different needs and different level of meeting their needs they said there is
no possible way to clarify ever changing needs as society changes.
It is very difficult to apply this Maslow theory in present work context
since it is the instrument of the likes of recognition, status and so on and as
a result of this the role of pay is problematic. It is also difficult to offer
self actualisation to employee since its nature is highly subjective.
·
The
Herzberg motivation-hygiene theory- This is also known as two factor theory.
According to Herzberg two factor theories he believes individual are influence
by two factors he called the satisfaction and dissatisfaction factor.
Satisfaction
factor- By this Herzberg believes that there are some factors that increases
satisfaction but have little or no effect on dissatisfaction and this is
primarily the result the result of a motivator factor and in the case of
dissatisfaction factors, these are factors that if not present or inadequate
have little or no effect on long term satisfaction and this are also the
primary result of hygiene factors. Herzberg list motivator factors to include
·
Achievement.
·
Recognition.
·
Work
it-self.
·
Responsibility.
·
Promotion.
·
Growth.
While the
hygiene factors include
·
Pay
and benefit.
·
Company
policy and administration.
·
Relationship
with co workers.
·
Physical
environment.
·
Supervision.
·
Status.
·
Job
security.
·
Salary.
In general
what Herzberg was saying is that if managers does not want unpleasantness at
work and also to deny unfair treatment the hygiene factors is necessary and
also management should not only stop at this if they want positive motivation
but also given attention to motivator factors.
There are
some critics of Herzberg two-factor theory and one of the criticism is that the
theory has only limited application to unskilled workers by this it means that
the theory is only applies to people with unskilled, boring job and also
limited in its application.
No matter
the amount of criticism Herzberg two-factor theory has helped organisation in
drawing their attention to the importance of job design in order to bring about
self development and job enrichment.
The
application of Herzberg two-factor theory can be seen clearly in an
organisation because it is this factor that drew the attention of organisation
to the importance of job design and job enrichment.
3. Vroom theory- This motivation theory is also called
expectancy theory and this means the will of an individual motivation to do
something depends on the level in which the individual expects the result of
his efforts, if achieved successfully it
will contribute towards his goals or need. Vroom made us believe that the strength
of an individual motivation is a product of two factors, the strength of his
preference for a certain outcome and also the past experience.
There are not many critics of vroom theory except that there
are difficulties in some of the concept involved.
The application of vroom theory within an organisation is a
bit clear compare to other theories. In an organisation we can see managers
rewarding individual according to their performance so the application of this
theory is very easy.
No comments:
Post a Comment